555 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
555 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
# NEXT STEPS - Action Plan
|
|
|
|
**Status:** Ready to validate & build MVP
|
|
**Timeline:** Start immediately
|
|
**Decision Point:** After Week 4 Validation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## THIS WEEK (Week 1)
|
|
|
|
### [ ] 1. Assemble Core Team
|
|
**Time:** 2 hours
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
You need for Phase 0 (Validation):
|
|
- Yourself as Founder/PM
|
|
- 1 Technical Co-founder (CTO or Lead Dev)
|
|
- 1 Business person (optional: for sales/fundraising)
|
|
|
|
Ideal profile:
|
|
- CTO: 5+ years software experience, B2B SaaS knowledge
|
|
- Business: Sales or startup experience, German market knowledge
|
|
|
|
Where to find:
|
|
- Co-founder networks
|
|
- Angel.co (cofounder matching)
|
|
- LinkedIn
|
|
- Personal network
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### [ ] 2. Secure Budget for Phase 0
|
|
**Time:** 1 hour
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Need: €20-30K for validation phase
|
|
|
|
Options:
|
|
A) Bootstrap from savings (€20-30K)
|
|
B) Friends & Family round (€30-50K)
|
|
C) Apply for Startup grant (BMBF, KfW)
|
|
- Process: 2-4 weeks
|
|
|
|
If bootstrapping: Delay validation to secure funds
|
|
If friends & family: Email your network this week
|
|
|
|
Sample email:
|
|
---
|
|
Subject: We're building a software solution for German utilities
|
|
|
|
Hi [Friend],
|
|
|
|
We're working on solving a major pain point for Stadtwerke:
|
|
manual meter reading costs them €50-100K/year + quality issues.
|
|
|
|
We've identified 5+ potential customers interested in a solution.
|
|
|
|
We're raising €30-50K Friends & Family to validate the market
|
|
and build an MVP. Interested in learning more?
|
|
|
|
Possible terms: SAFE, Convertible Note, or Equity
|
|
Timeline: Fast-track to profitability, goal €1M ARR Year 2
|
|
|
|
Let me know if you want to chat!
|
|
|
|
[Your Name]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Do this by: EOW
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### [ ] 3. Create Pitch Deck (Optional but helpful)
|
|
**Time:** 4 hours
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
10-15 slides:
|
|
1. Problem (Meter reading pain points)
|
|
2. Market (900 Stadtwerke, 8-10M household market)
|
|
3. Solution (SmartMeter-Lite App)
|
|
4. Business Model (SaaS, €80-120K/year)
|
|
5. Go-to-Market (Direct sales + partnerships)
|
|
6. Traction (interviews, early interest)
|
|
7. Team (backgrounds)
|
|
8. Financials (projections)
|
|
9. Ask (€30-50K, use of funds)
|
|
10. Contact
|
|
|
|
Tools: Pitch.com, Canva, or use template
|
|
|
|
Goal: Use for investor discussions, doesn't need to be perfect
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### [ ] 4. Start Interview Recruitment
|
|
**Time:** 3 hours
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Use VALIDATION_PLAYBOOK.md as guide
|
|
|
|
Create outreach list:
|
|
1. LinkedIn search "IT Director" + "Stadtwerk"
|
|
2. Email template (see playbook)
|
|
3. Target: 10-15 interviews scheduled by EOW
|
|
|
|
Quick wins:
|
|
- Reach out to 5 personal contacts first (warm intros)
|
|
- Ask them for referrals
|
|
- Then cold outreach to 20-30 others (5-7 will likely say yes)
|
|
|
|
Tools:
|
|
- LinkedIn Sales Navigator
|
|
- Hunter.io (find emails)
|
|
- Calendly (scheduling)
|
|
|
|
DO NOT: Wait for perfect conditions. Start recruiting now.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## WEEK 2-3 (Validation Phase Execution)
|
|
|
|
### [ ] 5. Conduct 10-15 Interviews
|
|
**Time:** ~12 hours (conducting) + 6 hours (prep/follow-up)
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Schedule:
|
|
- Week 2: 5-8 interviews
|
|
- Week 3: 5-7 interviews
|
|
|
|
Prep for each:
|
|
- Research company (Wikipedia, website)
|
|
- Prepare questions
|
|
- Test Zoom setup
|
|
|
|
During call:
|
|
- Record (with permission)
|
|
- Take notes (Google Doc shared)
|
|
- Be authentic, curious
|
|
- Don't pitch
|
|
|
|
Use template: VALIDATION_PLAYBOOK.md
|
|
Record all data in shared spreadsheet
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### [ ] 6. Competitive Analysis
|
|
**Time:** 4 hours
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Research competitors:
|
|
1. SAP SmartMeter Solutions
|
|
- Features, pricing, timeline
|
|
- Strengths vs. weaknesses
|
|
|
|
2. Oracle Utilities
|
|
- Same analysis
|
|
|
|
3. Regional players (Infor, Asseco, etc.)
|
|
- What are they doing?
|
|
|
|
4. Startups (Smappee, Zigbee Alliance tools)
|
|
- What's the latest?
|
|
|
|
Document findings:
|
|
- Feature comparison matrix
|
|
- Pricing comparison
|
|
- Time-to-market comparison
|
|
- Your differentiation
|
|
|
|
Conclusion: Why is our approach better/faster/cheaper?
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## WEEK 4 (GO / NO-GO Decision)
|
|
|
|
### [ ] 7. Score Interviews & Analyze Data
|
|
**Time:** 3 hours
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Use scoring framework from VALIDATION_PLAYBOOK.md
|
|
|
|
Aggregate:
|
|
- # of Hot Leads (score 8-10)
|
|
- # of Warm Leads (score 6-7)
|
|
- Average budget
|
|
- Market size estimate
|
|
- Common pain points
|
|
- Integration challenges
|
|
|
|
Create summary report with:
|
|
- Executive summary (1 page)
|
|
- Key findings (3-5 bullets)
|
|
- Top leads (with names, budgets, timeline)
|
|
- Risks & opportunities
|
|
- GO/NO-GO recommendation
|
|
|
|
Share with team for discussion
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### [ ] 8. Team Decision Meeting
|
|
**Time:** 2 hours
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Meeting agenda:
|
|
1. Present validation findings (you: 15 min)
|
|
2. Team discussion (30 min)
|
|
3. Vote on GO/NO-GO (15 min)
|
|
4. If GO: Celebrate & move to Phase 1
|
|
5. If NO-GO: Discuss pivot options
|
|
|
|
GO Criteria:
|
|
✅ 5+ Hot Leads with €50K+ budget each
|
|
✅ Average adoption estimate >20%
|
|
✅ Team feels confident in market opportunity
|
|
✅ Funding secured for development
|
|
|
|
NO-GO Criteria:
|
|
❌ <3 Hot Leads
|
|
❌ Average budget <€40K
|
|
❌ Low adoption estimates
|
|
❌ Clear market resistance
|
|
|
|
If NO-GO: Pivot to Pain Point #2 or #3 and repeat process
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### [ ] 9. If GO: Contact Top Leads about Pilot
|
|
**Time:** 3 hours
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Reach out to your 5 Hot Leads:
|
|
|
|
Email template:
|
|
---
|
|
Subject: Pilot Program: SmartMeter-Lite App
|
|
|
|
Dear [Name],
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the great conversation last week!
|
|
|
|
Based on our discussion, we're moving forward with developing
|
|
a mobile app solution for meter reading. We'd like to invite
|
|
you to join our Pilot Program.
|
|
|
|
Details:
|
|
- Free beta access (3 months)
|
|
- Early adopter pricing after (€60K/year instead of €80K)
|
|
- Weekly feedback sessions
|
|
- Direct access to our engineering team
|
|
|
|
Pilot Timeline:
|
|
- Start: April 2026
|
|
- Alpha release: May 2026
|
|
- Beta feedback period: May-June 2026
|
|
- Commercial launch: July 2026
|
|
|
|
Next steps:
|
|
- 30-min call to discuss details
|
|
- Sign NDA + LOI (simple document)
|
|
- Onboard for beta
|
|
|
|
Are you interested? Let's jump on a call this week.
|
|
|
|
Best regards,
|
|
[Your Name]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Goal: Get 3-5 signed LOIs (Letters of Intent)
|
|
|
|
Signed LOIs = Proof of market, helpful for fundraising
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## WEEKS 5+ (Development Phase)
|
|
|
|
### [ ] 10. Prepare for MVP Development
|
|
**Time:** 5 hours (decision-making)
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Use LEAN_ROADMAP_MVP.md
|
|
|
|
Decisions to make:
|
|
A. Tech Stack finalization
|
|
- React Native vs Flutter?
|
|
- Python vs Node.js?
|
|
- Tesseract vs Google Vision API?
|
|
|
|
B. Team assembly
|
|
- Hire 3-4 developers (or internal?)
|
|
- Find product manager
|
|
- Find designer
|
|
|
|
C. Development environment
|
|
- GitHub repo setup
|
|
- CI/CD pipeline
|
|
- Development server
|
|
|
|
D. Fundraising (if needed)
|
|
- €400-500K total for MVP + runway
|
|
- Timing: Should start in Week 3-4
|
|
- Close by Week 6-7 to start development
|
|
|
|
Fundraising timeline:
|
|
Week 3-4: Pitch to angels / seed VCs
|
|
Week 5-6: Due diligence
|
|
Week 7: Funding closed
|
|
Week 8: Team starts development
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### [ ] 11. Begin Phase 1: MVP Development
|
|
**Time:** This is the 12-week sprint!
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Kickoff meeting:
|
|
- Present project vision & timeline
|
|
- Review technical architecture
|
|
- Assign sprint teams
|
|
- Set up daily standups
|
|
|
|
First sprint goals:
|
|
- Infrastructure ready (GitHub, CI/CD, DB)
|
|
- API specification finalized
|
|
- UI/UX mockups approved
|
|
- OCR evaluation started
|
|
|
|
Each week:
|
|
- Sprint planning (2 hours)
|
|
- Daily standups (15 min)
|
|
- Sprint review (1 hour)
|
|
- Retro (1 hour)
|
|
|
|
Track progress in:
|
|
- GitHub (code)
|
|
- Jira/Linear (tasks)
|
|
- Figma (design)
|
|
- Weekly status deck
|
|
|
|
Key metrics to monitor:
|
|
- Development velocity (tasks/week)
|
|
- Bug count (trend down)
|
|
- Test coverage (target 70%+)
|
|
- Architecture debt (keep low)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Parallel Track: Fundraising
|
|
|
|
### If you need €400-500K:
|
|
|
|
**Timeline:**
|
|
```
|
|
Week 2-3: Build investor deck + intro list
|
|
Week 3-4: Start conversations (10-20 seed VCs)
|
|
Week 4-5: Meetings + pitches
|
|
Week 5-6: Due diligence with 3-5 top investors
|
|
Week 7: Close funding
|
|
Week 8: Onboard investors, start development
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Investor Pitches should emphasize:**
|
|
1. Real customer pain (proven in validation)
|
|
2. Large market (€5-12M TAM)
|
|
3. Fast time-to-market (4-6 months MVP)
|
|
4. Low burn (€40-50K/month = 10+ month runway)
|
|
5. Strong unit economics (€20K CAC, €80K ACV, 3.5:1 LTV:CAC)
|
|
6. Capital efficiency (€350K MVP vs. €2M competitors)
|
|
|
|
**Fundraise from:**
|
|
- Angel investors
|
|
- Seed VCs (500 Startups, Y Combinator Alumni, etc.)
|
|
- Corporate VCs (utilities, SAP, etc.)
|
|
- Impact/ESG funds (utilities = green energy theme)
|
|
|
|
**Do NOT:**
|
|
- Oversell / make claims you can't prove
|
|
- Ask for more than needed (€400-500K is right range)
|
|
- Rush into bad term sheets
|
|
- Neglect due diligence on investor fit
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Risk Mitigation Actions
|
|
|
|
**If Validation shows NO-GO:**
|
|
```
|
|
Option 1: Pivot to Pain Point #2 or #3
|
|
- Same interview process
|
|
- Validate that problem
|
|
- Potentially larger market or lower competition
|
|
|
|
Option 2: Pivot to different market
|
|
- Same solution (SmartMeter app)
|
|
- Different customer (e.g., gas companies, water utilities)
|
|
- Adjust messaging
|
|
|
|
Option 3: Pause & assess
|
|
- Wait for market conditions to improve
|
|
- Save capital
|
|
- Try again in 6 months
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**If Fundraising falls short:**
|
|
```
|
|
Option A: Bootstrap with lower burn
|
|
- 2 developers instead of 4
|
|
- Slower but achievable MVP (6-8 months)
|
|
- Founder salary: minimal/deferred equity
|
|
|
|
Option B: Raise less (€150-200K)
|
|
- Reduce team size
|
|
- Focus on MVP only (no nice-to-haves)
|
|
- Plan Series A for expansion
|
|
|
|
Option C: Revenue-first approach
|
|
- Get pilot customers signed up
|
|
- Charge them for early access
|
|
- Use revenue to fund development
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**If Development slips:**
|
|
```
|
|
Risk: Scope creep delays MVP launch
|
|
|
|
Mitigation:
|
|
- Cut features ruthlessly
|
|
- MVP = minimum viable, not "everything we want"
|
|
- Use MoSCoW method: Must-have, Should-have, Could-have, Won't-have
|
|
|
|
If behind by 2+ weeks:
|
|
- Reduce scope (cut "nice-to-haves")
|
|
- Add developer resources (carefully)
|
|
- Don't sacrifice quality for speed
|
|
- Communicate transparently with customers
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Key Success Metrics (by phase)
|
|
|
|
### Phase 0 (Validation) - Week 4
|
|
- [ ] 10+ interviews completed
|
|
- [ ] 5+ Hot Leads identified
|
|
- [ ] 3+ LOIs signed
|
|
- [ ] Market size >€500K validated
|
|
- [ ] GO decision made
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1 (MVP Dev) - Week 14
|
|
- [ ] MVP app released (iOS + Android)
|
|
- [ ] 5 beta customers onboarded
|
|
- [ ] NPS feedback collected
|
|
- [ ] Bug fixes underway
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2 (GTM) - Week 26
|
|
- [ ] 5-8 paying customers
|
|
- [ ] €50-100K MRR
|
|
- [ ] NPS > 50
|
|
- [ ] Positive word-of-mouth
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Monthly Checklist
|
|
|
|
**Every month:**
|
|
- [ ] Team standup on metrics vs. plan
|
|
- [ ] Customer feedback review
|
|
- [ ] Fundraising progress (if applicable)
|
|
- [ ] Competitive intelligence update
|
|
- [ ] Risk assessment & mitigation
|
|
- [ ] Investor update (if funded)
|
|
|
|
**Quarterly:**
|
|
- [ ] Board meeting / advisor check-in
|
|
- [ ] Market research refresh
|
|
- [ ] Team feedback/retrospective
|
|
- [ ] Strategic pivot assessment
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Document Reference Guide
|
|
|
|
As you execute, use these documents:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
📄 EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md
|
|
→ Share with investors
|
|
→ High-level business case
|
|
→ Keep updated every month
|
|
|
|
📄 REALISTIC_VS_OPTIMISTIC.md
|
|
→ When you're tempted to overcommit
|
|
→ Keep team aligned on realistic expectations
|
|
|
|
📄 LEAN_ROADMAP_MVP.md
|
|
→ Detailed project plan
|
|
→ Week-by-week tasks
|
|
→ Use for sprint planning
|
|
|
|
📄 VALIDATION_PLAYBOOK.md
|
|
→ Interview guide
|
|
→ Scoring framework
|
|
→ Use during Weeks 1-4
|
|
|
|
📄 This file (NEXT_STEPS.md)
|
|
→ High-level action plan
|
|
→ Weekly checklist
|
|
→ Reference when you're unsure what to do next
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Final Thoughts
|
|
|
|
**You have a real opportunity here.** The pain points are real, the market is large, and the timing is good (digitalization pressure on utilities).
|
|
|
|
But execution is everything. **Focus ruthlessly on:**
|
|
1. ✅ Validating the market (Weeks 1-4)
|
|
2. ✅ Building an excellent MVP (Weeks 5-14)
|
|
3. ✅ Getting first customers (Weeks 15-26)
|
|
4. ✅ Profitability (Year 2)
|
|
|
|
**Don't get distracted by:**
|
|
- ❌ Building all 5 solutions at once
|
|
- ❌ Perfectionism (done is better than perfect)
|
|
- ❌ Feature creep (say NO to 80% of requests)
|
|
- ❌ Premature scaling (focus on PMF first)
|
|
|
|
**The realistic financial model is still very attractive:**
|
|
- €350K investment
|
|
- Year 2: €2-4M ARR
|
|
- Year 3: €5-10M ARR
|
|
- Exit multiple: 5-8x → €25-80M exit
|
|
- Return to investors: 70-200x
|
|
|
|
That's a winning business. Go execute! 🚀
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Start this week. Don't wait.**
|
|
|
|
Week 1 Checklist (4 tasks):
|
|
- [ ] Assemble core team
|
|
- [ ] Secure budget
|
|
- [ ] Create pitch deck
|
|
- [ ] Start interview recruitment
|
|
|
|
Deadline: End of Friday
|
|
|
|
Then report back on progress. 💪
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Document Status:** Action-ready, living document
|
|
**Last Updated:** February 2026
|
|
**Next Milestone:** Week 4 GO/NO-GO Decision
|